On 2013-07-24 13:31, RW wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 13:00:59 +0200 > Simon Loewenthal wrote: > >> Hi, Yesterday, this did not hit BAYES at all, and now this hits BAYES_00, >> and I did not use autolearn. I did a sa-learn --forget for good measure and >> this changed nothing (*see below). I am a little flummoxed. Do any of you >> have any ideas? Little email and result of spamc can be found here >> http://pastebin.com/5N0xhWms [1] [1] > > This isn't a GTUBE email, it's an email with lots of innocuous text and > the obfuscated name of a drug claiming to be a GTUBE email. > > http://spamassassin.apache.org/gtube/ [2] > > If it wasn't previously getting any BAYES result then presumably it was > short-circuiting on something. Perhaps the previous mail was a real > GTUBE mail short-circuiting on GTUBE - although I'm not sure why > anyone would want to do that. This is a GTUBE test email I'm using to test if rules I wrote fired. I just don't know why this started hitting bayes zero all of a sudden. This shortcircuits because the server is configured to do so, and I could turn this off. Links: ------ [1] http://pastebin.com/5N0xhWms [2] http://spamassassin.apache.org/gtube/
