Amir 'CG' Caspi skrev den 2013-06-20 11:13:
BTW, I'm not talking about _actually_ reversing MailScanner's
"protection." I'm talking about SA understanding enough to unmunge
the URI **for SA processing only**. The actual mail delivered to the
end-user would remain munged. SA would not be reversing anything, it
would simply have sufficient know-how to parse what MailScanner had
done.
is it not possible to run spamassassin first ?, and then later in
mailscanner make the munges ?
eg if mailscanner is brain dead designed, call it once with munges
enabled, and one more time with spamassassin only, that way you can
control order of munges, and you will get better results of calling
mailscanner the first time, hmm :)
i think its just out of order what you do, not what you like to be the
end results
I apologize for getting everyone's gander up. I'll drop this
MailScanner subject and return to my hole.
then no one can help you :)
--
senders that put my email into body content will deliver it to my own
trashcan, so if you like to get reply, dont do it
