On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Amir 'CG' Caspi wrote:
At 10:13 AM -0700 06/18/2013, John Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013, Amir 'CG' Caspi wrote:
> Any idea why it failed to hit, and does this need another rule revision?
Yep, and yep. Revision committed. Initial comment gibberish rule committed.
Thanks for the revision. Do you want to explain why it failed and how you
fixed it? =)
The earlier version wasn't allowing for some punctuation in the gibberish.
There may be a period of whack-a-mole here, I was conservative in the
change I made.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
So Microsoft's invented the ASCII equivalent to ugly ink spots that
appear on your letter when your pen is malfunctioning.
-- Greg Andrews, about Microsoft's way to encode apostrophes
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Today: SWMBO's Birthday
