29.05.2013 11:20, Simon Loewenthal kirjoitti: > > On 2013-05-29 9:21, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > >> On 28.05.13 17:30, Simon Loewenthal wrote: >>> I looked at scoring for an email on an SA installation and noticed >>> differences between hand scanning with spamc and scanning with >>> spamd. My manually scanned email hit CLAMAV sane security, (ignore >>> Bayes because the user had Bayes process this and then asked me >>> about this), whilst this spamd delivered message did not hit >>> CLAMAV_SANE The local.cf had a timeout of 250 seconds (default is >>> 300). The clamav logs did not record any connection from SA during >>> the spamd scan, yet did record a connection from spamc when I >>> manually scanned the message so I think spamd skipped clamav scans. >> The only reason why spamc/spamd could give different results than >> spamassassin is that they scan as different user, otherwise they should use >> just the same configs. >>> Hand scanned with # cat $MESSAGEFILE | spamc -R -u spamd >> Here you instruct spamc to scan message as user spamd which means the >> spamd's user preferences. >>> Results when scanned by spamd via postfix: >>> Tue May 28 14:17:55 2013 [20590] info: spamd: result: . 5 - >>> BAYES_50,DCC_CHECK,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20,HTML_MESSAGE,JOB_OFFERS_PHASES,MTX_FAIL,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_SOFTFAIL,SPF_SOFTFAIL,T_REMOTE_IMAGE >>> scantime=18.9,size=145848,user=exam...@example.co.uk,uid=5002,required_score=6.0,rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=38517,mid >>> <mailto:user=exam...@example.co.uk,uid=5002,required_score=6.0,rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=38517,mid>=<51a49fdb.908...@hsbc.co.uk >>> <mailto:51a49fdb.908...@hsbc.co.uk>>,bayes=0.500979,autolearn=no,shortcircuit=no >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> here postfix instructs spamd to scan as user "exam...@example.co.uk >> <mailto:exam...@example.co.uk>" >> >> what happens when you pass arguments "-u exam...@example.co.uk >> <mailto:exam...@example.co.uk>" to spamc, >> instead of "-u spamd" ? >> > Hi, Matus, I tried this and had the same results when I passed the -u > exam...@example.co.uk <mailto:exam...@example.co.uk> > >
Anyway, spamc is the interface for spamd in all cases, IMHO postfix must
call spamc to get the work done.
--
Q: What do you call a WASP who doesn't work for his father, isn't a
lawyer, and believes in social causes?
A: A failure.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
