From: "Joe Acquisto-j4" <j...@j4computers.com> Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 09:10:26 -0400 >>> On 4/19/2013 at 8:33 PM, "Joe Acquisto-j4" <j...@j4computers.com> wrote: >>>> On 4/19/2013 at 8:26 PM, "Joe Acquisto-j4" <j...@j4computers.com> wrote: >> I thought I had corrected this issue, with someone's assistance, a while > ago: >> >> Apr 19 20:21:02.477 [23670] dbg: bayes: expiry completed >> Apr 19 20:21:02.477 [23670] info: archive-iterator: skipping large message >> Learned tokens from 0 message(s) (0 message(s) examined) > > Please ignore. As much as possible. I was testing manually and forgot > --mbox on the command line. > > However, I can see something is amiss as it is happily accepting spam I > thought had been previously submitted. > > joe a. Ok, I am officially puzzled. I setup email addresses on my SA box, to which I and others (they say) send ham/spam. Then I have cron tasks that feed those emails twice daily to bayes. And emails the output to my admin mailbox. I can review those admin messages and see "Learned tokens from n message(s) (n message(s) examined)". Yet, if i resend the bayes food from those dates, it appears to re-learn them. I would expect "Learned tokens from 0 messages(s) (n messages(s). . . " if it already had seen them. I have tried this for several dates and get the same result. What could it be? Not Operator Trouble, surely . . . joe a
Bayes uses the message id from the email message to remember which messages it has seen. If you are really emailing the messages then you are getting a new message-id which is then learned. You need to train on the unadulterated original email message. You can do this by attaching the complete email message. Otherwise you are training bayes to recognize tokens added by your users during the forwarding process as a spam indicator. -jeff
