>>> On 4/18/2013 at 6:15 AM, Axb <axb.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 04/18/2013 12:11 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote:
>> I'm missing something.
>>
>> Find a fair amount of missed SPAM showing, among others:
>>
>> *  0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% *
>> [score: 0.4968]
>>
>> Bayes is way too low, in my HO.
> 
> it's obviously not learning enough of whatever it's not scoring higher...
> 
>>  I am puzzled by the line after it.
>>
>> I set local.cf with: score BAYES_50_BODY 3.6 and restarted sa.
>>
>> Still comes thru with the low score.  Am I sticking it in the wrong
>> place?  Or can it not be overridden?   I do not recall if the odd
>> second line was there before I made the change.
> 
> seems like a phatphingers error:
> 
> should be:
> 
> score BAYES_50 3.6
> 
> and NOT:
> 
> score BAYES_50_BODY 3.6

Boy, that phingers guy is a real PITA.   More like phathead, as that's what I 
intended.  But right after I posted I re-examined and said to myself "self . . 
."  

Thanks.  Might the odd line be a result of that?

joea.



Reply via email to