>>> On 4/18/2013 at 6:15 AM, Axb <axb.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 04/18/2013 12:11 PM, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: >> I'm missing something. >> >> Find a fair amount of missed SPAM showing, among others: >> >> * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * >> [score: 0.4968] >> >> Bayes is way too low, in my HO. > > it's obviously not learning enough of whatever it's not scoring higher... > >> I am puzzled by the line after it. >> >> I set local.cf with: score BAYES_50_BODY 3.6 and restarted sa. >> >> Still comes thru with the low score. Am I sticking it in the wrong >> place? Or can it not be overridden? I do not recall if the odd >> second line was there before I made the change. > > seems like a phatphingers error: > > should be: > > score BAYES_50 3.6 > > and NOT: > > score BAYES_50_BODY 3.6
Boy, that phingers guy is a real PITA. More like phathead, as that's what I intended. But right after I posted I re-examined and said to myself "self . . ." Thanks. Might the odd line be a result of that? joea.