Hi, > But I stand by my local.cf entry reducing RP_MATCHES_RCVD to an advisory
> -0.001; it may be useful in combination with other rules, but I don't > think it's valuable enough on its own to have even -0.5 points. I can't > say I've seen any evidence in the mail stream I deal with that scoring > down like that is causing either FPs or FNs. > > These values are automatically generated from presumably tens or hundreds of thousands of messages to determine exactly how it should be weighted, just like all other stock rules, correct? I can understand adjusting the values slightly for each user's particular situation, but doesn't it generally throw off the balance of how the email as a whole is weighted when you adjust values in that way? Thanks, Alex
