> On Thu, 7 Mar 2013 13:47:55 +0100 > Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uh...@fantomas.sk> wrote: > > > the implementation of fork() in linux makes it nearly the same as > > vfork(). > > That is completely wrong. Just because modern forks use copy-on-write > doesn't make them anything at all like vfork; the semantics are utterly > different.
Uhu! You need to put things in their own context in order to get the semantic. Should I had to say: "a fork under linux attains performances as close to a vfork"? I'm replying to a list, not writing a CS book, come on... Giampaolo > Regards, > > David.
