On 3/4/2013 1:38 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 3/1/2013 6:14 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
score RCVD_IN_NJABL_CGI 0
score RCVD_IN_NJABL_MULTI 0
score RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY 0
score RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY 0
score RCVD_IN_NJABL_SPAM 0
And score __RCVD_IN_NJABL 0 just in case...
Should this be happening:
72_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_NJABL_CGI 0.001 0.001
0.001 0.001
72_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_NJABL_MULTI 0.001 0.001
0.001 0.001
72_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY 0.001 0.001
0.001 0.001
72_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_NJABL_RELAY 0.001 0.001
0.001 0.001
72_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_NJABL_SPAM 0.001 0.001
0.001 0.001
?
No, but are the rules included? They don't appear to be for me so these
are scores for nothing... Recommend we check after the weekend net check.
I've looked at the code and it appears to be odd. But there is a lot of
stuff related to NJABL to get rid of it once and for all.
t/priorities.t has a rule based on NJABL
lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm references NJABL
rules/20_dnsbl_tests.cf has a reuse line that references NJABL
Anything I missed?
