On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Bowie Bailey <bowie_bai...@buc.com> wrote:
> On 2/11/2013 3:23 AM, Anirudha Patil wrote: > >> >> I have a MTA setup of [Postfix + Amavis-new + ClamAV + Spamassasin] of >> which only the spamassasin part is disabled. Now i wish to enable the >> Spamcontrol part. >> > <snip> > > [root@host spamassassin]# cat /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin >> # Options to spamd >> SPAMDOPTIONS="-d -c -m5 -H" >> > > > This is irrelevant if you are using SpamAssassin via Amavisd-new. > > [root@host spamassassin]# cat local.cf <http://local.cf> >> # These values can be overridden by editing ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs.cf< >> http://user_prefs.cf> >> >> # (see spamassassin(1) for details) >> >> # These should be safe assumptions and allow for simple visual sifting >> # without risking lost emails. >> >> required_hits 5 >> report_safe 0 >> rewrite_header Subject [SPAM] >> > > > When you are calling SA via Amavis, the portions of SA's config related > to required_hits and any header re- writing are ignored in favor of the > settings in the Amavis config. > > > [root@host spamassassin]# ps -elf | grep spam >> 5 S root 29836 1 46 81 0 - 7184 pause 09:38 ? >> 00:00:00 /usr/bin/spamd -d -c -m5 -H >> 1 S root 29839 29836 0 78 0 - 7184 - 09:38 ? >> 00:00:00 spamd child >> 1 S root 29840 29836 0 78 0 - 7184 - 09:38 ? >> 00:00:00 spamd child >> 1 S root 29841 29836 0 81 0 - 7184 - 09:38 ? >> 00:00:00 spamd child >> 1 S root 29842 29836 0 81 0 - 7184 - 09:38 ? >> 00:00:00 spamd child >> 1 S root 29843 29836 0 81 0 - 7184 - 09:38 ? >> 00:00:00 spamd child >> 4 R root 29845 28512 0 78 0 - 1171 - 09:38 pts/2 >> 00:00:00 grep spam >> > > > Amavisd-new runs the SA code internally. You do not need to have spamd > running. > > So what should be the ideal setup of running binaries. I want Amavis running both Spamprotection and ANtivirus protection, hence i have below process running in current production 1. Postfix MTA 2. Amavisd 3. Clamd Should the spamd be running for spamprotection via amavis-new?
