That implies that what ever mechanism you're using in the original process
is adding a blank line (or bare 'nl' or 'cr') to the beginning of the
message that you're then handing to SA.
Idiot question, are you doing (or not) a "chomp" in the initial read
process?
On Fri, 28 Dec 2012, Sean Tout wrote:
Hi Henrik & Jeff,
One more input that might shed more light. I copied one of the emails from
the above 3 emails into its own file and ran spamassassin from the command
line in test mode against it and it worked fine. the command is
spamassassin --test-mode < /spamemails/singleemail.spam
where singleemail.spam contains a single spam email.
Regards,
-Sean.
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Spamassassin-not-parsing-email-messages-tp102770p102782.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Dave Funk University of Iowa
<dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.edu> College of Engineering
319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center
Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_admin Iowa City, IA 52242-1527
#include <std_disclaimer.h>
Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{
