On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 13:11:53 -0500 Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > On 12/16/2012 8:43 AM, RW wrote: > > On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 18:25:44 +0100 > > Axb wrote: > > > >> On 12/15/2012 06:12 PM, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > >>> Why is the STOX stuff all repeated twice? > >>> X-Spam-Report: > >>> * 0.2 STOX_REPLY_TYPE STOX_REPLY_TYPE <--- see, twice on > >> If rule doesn't have a description, rulename becomes the > >> description > > Personally, I'd rather it were just left blank or replaced with a > > standard string. > > > > I find it makes it harder to notice a rule in the status report. > I'd rather the rule have a description but I agree, a "no further > description available" seems better. Can you open a bug report?
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6880
