On 12/11/2012 8:29 PM, Joseph Acquisto wrote:
Suddenly a lot of garbage is getting thru. Stuff with nonsense text, etc.
This is what I see:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on open-122
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=DECEASED_NO_ML,HTML_MESSAGE
autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Report:
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* 0.1 DECEASED_NO_ML Dead not via mailing list
and
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on open-122
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,
FROM_12LTRDOM,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_3,
T_REMOTE_IMAGE autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-Spam-Report:
* 0.7 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20 BODY: HTML: images with 1600-2000 bytes of
words
* 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
* 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
* valid
* -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
* 0.3 HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_3 HTML is very short with a linked image
* 1.6 T_REMOTE_IMAGE Message contains an external image
* 0.1 FROM_12LTRDOM From a 12-letter domain
The autolearn seems odd.
Without seeing the messages, there's not much we can say about the
scores. Put the full messages in pastebin and give us the link so we
can look at it.
The autolearn looks normal to me.
autolearn=unavailable -- This means that something was locking the
bayes database when this message was processed.
autolearn=no -- This means that SA looked at the message and decided
not to learn from it. In this case, the score is too high to autolearn
as ham and too low to autolearn as spam.
I don't see the bayes rules firing. Is this a new SA setup? Once you
learn enough messages to activate the bayes scoring, you should see a
bayes rule hit on every email.
--
Bowie
