Take care with Xerox versions, it just changed.

I mentioned this in my reply to Kris.

I do not trust PHP Mailers, as PHP is wrong by design.

Alex, from prypiat.
Yes, I recycle.


On 12-11-30 10:17 AM, Kris Deugau wrote:
> John Hardin wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Kris Deugau wrote:
>>
>>> I've just had another couple of reports of false positives due to hits
>>> on one or more of the FROM_MISSP_* rules.
>>>
>>> Curious coincidence:  Almost all of the reports to date have involved
>>> webform email for real estate companies.  Most of the rest have involved
>>> scan-to-email multifunction devices - mostly Xerox.... used by real
>>> estate companies.  O_o
>> Is there any possibility of getting user agent headers for these FPs? If
>> a particular piece of legit software always does this then obviously
>> those rules should ignore such messages.
> The most recent scan-to-email had:
>
> X-Mailer: WorkCentre 7428
>
> and another couple of older ones showed:
>
> X-Mailer: WorkCentre 7435
>
> Walking Xerox's list of scan-to-email-capable devices will probably turn
> up another couple of possible model numbers.
>
> Digging back in the FP archive, there are a handful of webform messages
> with "X-Mailer: PHP4", and none of the rest have even that much.
>
> None of the ones I've had reported are from desktop or mobile MUAs.
>
> Two are from airlines - one an ezine from Air Canada, the other a
> receipt/itinerary from Air Creebec.
>
> -kgd

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to