On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Olivier Nicole wrote:
Finally, I am wondering if fuzzyOCR still has any interest? Like above, I'd like to see it push the stings it can identify to the body of the message, for further analysis by SA, rather than having it's own list of spam words.
I believe that FuzzrOCR should not be dismissed. I still fairly regularly see spams that consist of only an image attachment, or where the spammy content is only in an image attachment.
-- John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ...intellectuals have no interest in what _creates_ wealth, and what _inhibits_ the creation of wealth. They are very concerned about the _distribution_ of it, but they act as if wealth just exists somehow. It's like manna from heaven, it's only a question of how we split it up. -- Thomas Sowell ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 168 days since the first successful private support mission to ISS (SpaceX)
