On Sat, 10 Nov 2012, Igor Chudov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 08:47:57AM +0300, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
So, why is it triggering URIBL_BLACK and URIBL_DBL_SPAM etc now, but
not when I received the original spam?
Or was the database updated with those
URLs after I received that particular spam?
It is quite likely that it was not in the database when you received it, but
was added afterwards. I have seen that with a few URLs myself.
If so, I am wondering, is there some sort of a "solution" that could
delay certain incoming emails for, say, 30 minutes, until they are
checked for spam. I would prefer it to be flaxible enough not to apply
to certain "good" emails.
Ayup. Google "greylisting". A lot of us use it for this reason, plus a lot
of spammers don't retry delivery.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Any time law enforcement becomes a revenue center, the system
becomes corrupt.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tomorrow: Veterans Day
