>>> On 11/4/2012 at 7:10 PM, Martin Gregorie <mar...@gregorie.org> wrote: > On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 15:33 -0500, Joseph Acquisto wrote: >> >>> On 11/4/2012 at 8:34 AM, Martin Gregorie <mar...@gregorie.org> wrote: >> > On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 07:55 -0500, Joseph Acquisto wrote: >> >> >>> On 11/3/2012 at 9:15 PM, "Joseph Acquisto" <j...@j4computers.com> >> >> >>> wrote: >> >> > Why do these score 0 ? >> >> > >> >> > http://pastebin.com/U4zFu8wk >> >> > http://pastebin.com/MV9KbnbU >> >> >> > I ran the second one through my testing SA system: it got hits from >> > several blacklists together with hits on RDNS_NONE and >> > UNPARSEABLE_RELAY: >> >> I have RDNS_NONE 0, and UNPARSEABLE_RELAY 2. I understand 0 to mean "don't > test", but don't >> get why it did not flag UNPARSEABLE_RELAY. >> > Pass. Not enough information for me to understand the problem and anyway > its not something I fully understand. > >> > >> > RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_PSBL, >> > RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL,RCVD_IN_XBL,RDNS_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_AB_SURBL, >> > URIBL_BLACK,URIBL_DBL_SPAM,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL >> >> I'd love to use RBL but understand I can't, as the "last IP" is always the > same, as I fetch all mail >> from a single POP. Perhaps I am missing something? >> > My set-up is very similar to yours. I use getmail[1] to read mail from > my POP3 mailbox on my ISP's mailserver and pass it on to my MTA, Postfix > running on my house server, which hands incoming mail to Dovecot for > delivery to my mailreader. In SA's local.cf I've set: > > internal_networks 192.168.7/24 > > trusted_networks 192.168.7/24 > trusted_networks 77.75.108.10 # my ISP's mailserver > > and with this set-up the various RBLs and URIBLs work just fine. > > [1] I started by using fetchmail, but it is buggy (network transients > can cause it to leave mail it has read in the ISP mailbox forever) and > various forums report that its author has marked these as "won't fix". > So, I now use getmail instead. No problems to report so far! getmail > even uses the same MDA script you may have written for fetchmail. The > only significant difference is that fetchmail is a daemon that controls > its own fetch frequency while getmail is a program that crond runs every > 'n' minutes to look for and fetch mail. > > > Martin
It was simple to setup getmail to get a test message, but it did not deliver it as expected. I expected it to be handed off to postfix/spamassassin, but it did not seem to do that. But that is not a discussion for this list, I guess. joe a.