>>> On 11/4/2012 at 7:10 PM, Martin Gregorie <mar...@gregorie.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 15:33 -0500, Joseph Acquisto wrote:
>> >>> On 11/4/2012 at 8:34 AM, Martin Gregorie <mar...@gregorie.org> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 07:55 -0500, Joseph Acquisto wrote:
>> >> >>> On 11/3/2012 at 9:15 PM, "Joseph Acquisto" <j...@j4computers.com> 
>> >> >>> wrote:
>> >> > Why do these score 0 ?
>> >> > 
>> >> > http://pastebin.com/U4zFu8wk 
>> >> > http://pastebin.com/MV9KbnbU 
>> >> 
>> > I ran the second one through my testing SA system: it got hits from
>> > several blacklists together with hits on RDNS_NONE and
>> > UNPARSEABLE_RELAY:
>> 
>> I have RDNS_NONE 0, and UNPARSEABLE_RELAY 2.  I understand 0 to mean "don't 
> test", but don't
>> get why it did not flag UNPARSEABLE_RELAY.
>> 
> Pass. Not enough information for me to understand the problem and anyway
> its not something I fully understand.
> 
>> > 
>> > RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_PSBL,
>> > RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL,RCVD_IN_XBL,RDNS_NONE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_AB_SURBL,
>> > URIBL_BLACK,URIBL_DBL_SPAM,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL
>> 
>> I'd love to use RBL but understand I can't, as the "last IP" is always the 
> same, as I fetch all mail
>> from a single POP.    Perhaps I am missing something?
>> 
> My set-up is very similar to yours. I use getmail[1] to read mail from
> my POP3 mailbox on my ISP's mailserver and pass it on to my MTA, Postfix
> running on my house server, which hands incoming mail to Dovecot for
> delivery to my mailreader. In SA's local.cf I've set:
> 
> internal_networks    192.168.7/24
> 
> trusted_networks     192.168.7/24
> trusted_networks     77.75.108.10   # my ISP's mailserver
> 
> and with this set-up the various RBLs and URIBLs work just fine.
> 
> [1] I started by using fetchmail, but it is buggy (network transients
> can cause it to leave mail it has read in the ISP mailbox forever) and
> various forums report that its author has marked these as "won't fix". 
> So, I now use getmail instead. No problems to report so far! getmail
> even uses the same MDA script you may have written for fetchmail. The
> only significant difference is that fetchmail is a daemon that controls
> its own fetch frequency while getmail is a program that crond runs every
> 'n' minutes to look for and fetch mail.
> 
> 
> Martin

It was simple to setup getmail to get a test message, but it did not deliver it
as expected.  I expected it to be handed off to postfix/spamassassin, but it
did not seem to do that.   But that is not a discussion for this list, I guess.

joe a.

Reply via email to