On Mon, 2012-09-17 at 10:44 -0400, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote: > On 09/17, Noel Butler wrote: > > I'm sure every network running a mail server would like to assume they > > are > > 100% whitehat too. I see no reason to treat them special, just like gmail > > who think they are above it all, I wont include hotmail in that, as they > > I suppose you think you're capable of achieving a higher ratio of outgoing > non-spam to spam than gmail, with anything near their number of users?
Suppose? I'm bloody sure of it! given the gmail spam that spews into here, hotmail still rank with many more users, and they have nowhere near the same level of spewing garbage as gmail does. and yes, gmail have been intermittently blocked here from time to time, some might not like that, but I tend to not give in the noisy whining sulky minority, my responsibility is to the _masses_ and given the overall weekly average inbound gmail count is only about 4%, it really doesnt bother me too much at all. Hotmail btw has average of 17%, but that's here, YMMV.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
