On 08/15, Matt wrote: > I have messages marked as such: > > RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS > > Problem is they very clearly have reverse and matching forward DNS > that Exim even agrees on. Why is SA tagging them as such?
I wonder how much this is related to the other post I just made. Exim is notorious for allowing people to modify their Received headers in a way that doesn't comply with anything. Are they in headers SA is failing to parse? Run it through spamassassin -D. -- "Safe is anywhere a hungry person can't walk in three days." - John Titor http://www.ChaosReigns.com
