On 8/15/2012 11:06 AM, Jim Schueler wrote:
Upon Kevin's recommendation, I upgraded. Big difference. 'Though
there's a bit of a retuning penalty.
Woohoo, I was right! All I did was flip a coin, though ;-)
I get quite a few authorize.net <http://authorize.net> notifications
on behalf of various ecommerce clients, and this morning I started
seeing scam/spam similar to the attached. All share a common marker
of embedding a text url within an HTML <a> tag containing a different
URL. This seems like an obvious marker for spam, I wonder why there
isn't a rule for it.
There are many patterns that show up in spam that unfortunately show up
in ham as well. If my memory serves me correctly, this just is
indicative of spam or ham.
HOWEVER, some mail systems with good glue like MIMEDefang can do things
like disable links that do this or redirect them to a CGI that gives the
end-user some warning, etc.
Regards,
KAM
