Hello Ben, Tuesday, August 14, 2012, 3:30:18 PM, you wrote:
BJ> The majority of the spam that our users receive is a direct result of BJ> this one rule; it seems that plenty of spammers are white-listed in this BJ> database, and it is a weighty test (it reduces the score by as much as 2 BJ> or 3 points in some cases, often putting the message just below the BJ> required-for-spam score). We have no use for it. I must admit that I don't find that and they do seem reasonably resposive in changing listing if you report spam to them. -- Best regards, Niamh mailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpyLP3jLBC6t.pgp
Description: PGP signature
