In an older episode, on 2012-05-26 22:38, Wolfgang Zeikat wrote:
We had so many false positives
Oops, I used your term "false positives" by accident. I and many others
tend no call false Ham classifications
false negatives
(negative scores change the classification towards ham)
So:
We had so many false negatives
with that rule, that I - as others who
replied to your post already (see below) - have come to the conclusion
that www.dnswl.org is not a reliable source of trust for us and disabled
the rule by configuring
score RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL 0
0 is zero, not uppercase o
Cheers,
wolfgang
