03/03/2012 13:24, RW wrote:
Amedeo Rinaldo wrote:
I cannot write tons of "meta __FLAG_X (!THIS_RULE
&& !THIS_OTHER_RULE&& ..)"
I need some sort of match like "if AllFiredRules in (RuleA, RuleB,
RuleC, ...) -> raise __FLAG_Y".
That is a simple RuleA&& RuleB ... meta
Maybe I've not really understood the meta syntax, but IMHO ..
(sorry for my bad custom-meta-language and english)
<A> fire __FLAGX if AllFiredRules in (RuleA, RuleB, ..RuleN)
<B> meta __FLAGX RuleA && RuleB.. && RuleN
1) In <B> I cannot control not-in-the-list fired rules. We can have
fired OtherRuleX and 'meta __FLAGX' is still fired. In <A> the check
exclude the presence of not listed rules.
2) In <B> all rules must fire, in <A> we can have a not-fired-RuleN but
still have a 'fire __FLAGX'.
What you can do is count rule like this:
meta __FLAG_Z (rule1 + rule2 + rule3 + ... + ruleN)>= 3
Yes, but I cannot count not explicitly indicated ones.
Rules can change frequently (I can add my own) ..and furthermore it's
insane to list all rules :-)
My idea was a 'fast logic' like:
- if num(fired-rules) > threshold -> SKIP
- if (fired-rules) not_in_array (RuleA,RuleB,..) -> SKIP
- ..
or even better create your own parallel scoring system like this:
meta __FLAG_Z ( 1.1*rule1 + 0.2*rule2 + ... + 2.9*ruleN)>= 5.0
well, good to know.. thanks
Have a nice week-end
--
.''`. *Amedeo Rinaldo*
: :' : debian addicted ;-)
`. `'
`-
