Kris Deugau wrote:
I've adjusted one machine with min-spare and max-spare at 5, the other min-spare 2 and max-spare 5; but I don't think that's it. (Although even reducing the number of incidents will help...)
The senior systems guy bumped these up further after another incident with a 300K monitoring message sent to a staff alias yesterday; so far so good (the same notice today didn't cause a failure, anyway).
We'll be watching for a little while to see if this is "good enough", or if we need to dig further.
-kgd
