Yes, I still have other rules enabled. I have found the Cloudmark product to be extremely accurate, and really my question is specific to whether "razor == cloudmark" or to what extent they are related and how, so I can better understand the results I'm seeing.
Thanks for the reply, AJ Martin Hepworth-2 wrote: > > Of course razor2 checks only provide part of the score to SA , have you > checked the other rules fired on that email and the nothing else is > marking > the score down? > > Martin > > On Thursday, 5 January 2012, AJ Weber <awe...@comcast.net> wrote: >> >> I am testing the Razor2 plugin and am surprised that some "obvious" spam > is >> getting through. The reason I'm most surprised is that the SA install >> (3.3.1) seems to be checking the message with Razor2 and passing it. >> However, I have "Cloudmark Desktop One" running on my PC, and when the >> message gets to my PC, that client flags it as spam immediately. >> >> Can someone tell me the relationship between Razor2 and Cloudmark? It >> appears to be somewhat supported by the same people. So is the Razor >> data >> purposely not refreshed as often in order to sell Cloudmark Authority >> licenses? >> >> I was sort of thinking it all used the same reference-db, but maybe not. >> (If they DO, then I have some follow-on questions about how to debug why > the >> Razor2 plugin is not flagging a message that Cloudmark One is flagging > only >> milliseconds later.) >> >> Thanks for any info on the above and any troubleshooting techniques that > you >> can share. >> >> -AJ >> >> -- >> View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/razor2-and-cloudmark--tp33082922p33082922.html >> Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > -- > -- > Martin Hepworth > Oxford, UK > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/razor2-and-cloudmark--tp33082922p33086148.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
