Interesting. Will cross-post to dev and see if anyone has some
input. On 12/16/2011 12:22 PM, Lutz Petersen wrote: I know some of the discussions in the past about usage of Sorbs RBLs in Spamassassin. The scores today are as follows:score RCVD_IN_SORBS_BLOCK 0 # n=0 n=1 n=2 n=3 score RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 0 0.001 0 0.001 # n=0 n=2 score RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP 0 2.499 0 0.001 # n=0 n=2 score RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC 0 # n=0 n=1 n=2 n=3 score RCVD_IN_SORBS_SMTP 0 # n=0 n=1 n=2 n=3 score RCVD_IN_SORBS_SOCKS 0 2.443 0 1.927 # n=0 n=2 score RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB 0 0.614 0 0.770 # n=0 n=2 score RCVD_IN_SORBS_ZOMBIE 0 # n=0 n=1 n=2 n=3 The 0-Scores for DUL was done because lot of people thought there were too much false positives within that (I dont see so, but ok). Another Argument for 0-Scoring or not using sorbs was that the rbl contains a lot of old (meaning not actual) entries in the spam section (in mind of the dislist policy). Ok. But today I take a deeper look at the sorbs rbls and found, that there is a very simple misconfigration in the SA rules. The rbl check is done against the big 'dnsbl.sorbs.net' zone: eval:check_rbl('sorbs', 'dnsbl.sorbs.net.') And _that_ in my opinion is wrong. The rbl lookup should be done against the rbl 'safe.dnsbl.sorbs.net' instead. This rbl is a compilation of most of the sorbs partial lists as dnsbl.sorbs.net but with a simple difference: In opposite to dnsl.sorbs.net it does not contain the 'recent.spam' and the 'old.spam' partial lists, which are contained in 'dnsbl.sorbs.net'. The only spam listed in this 'safe.dnsbl.sorbs.net' contains spam of the last 24 hours, so the arguments against using sorbs especially because of its spam delisting policy do not exist. One could simply change the rbl lookup to the right zone and so also score spams within that rbl (low). Description of the different sorbs partial-zones as of the aggregate zones here: https://www.sorbs.net/using.shtml --
Kevin A. McGrail President
Peregrine Computer Consultants Corporation
703-359-9700 x50 / 800-823-8402 (Toll-Free)
![]() |
- SA Sorbs Usage/Rules Lutz Petersen
- Re: SA Sorbs Usage/Rules Kevin A. McGrail
- Re: SA Sorbs Usage/Rules darxus
- Re: SA Sorbs Usage/Rules Noel Butler
- Re: SA Sorbs Usage/Rules Matus UHLAR - fantomas
- Re: SA Sorbs Usage/Rules Noel Butler