Quoting "Kevin A. McGrail" <kmcgr...@pccc.com>:
On 12/3/2011 1:46 PM, Bruno Costacurta wrote:
note : spamassassin version = 3.3.1, called from Postfix as
spamd, platform is Debian stable Squeeze
I configured a test blacklist user in /etc/spamassassin/local.cf.
Indeed the blacklist user is identified as below via process
spamd in Postfix mail.info :
..etc..
spamd: result: Y 97 -
BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,TVD_SPACE_RATIO,T_DKIM_INVALID,USER_IN_BLACKLIST
..etc..
However the header do not mention it, and the score is negative
so the email is considered as a non-spam.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=2.0
tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,TVD_SPACE_RATIO,T_DKIM_INVALID
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
In file /usr/share/spamassassin/50_scores.cf :
score USER_IN_BLACKLIST 100.000
In /etc/spamassassin/local.cf
blacklist_from here-a-test-email-addr...@gmail.com
Something is missing ?
Do I need to configure more than the local.cf file ?
Looks like you are calling spamassassin more than once on the same
email. And a required score of 2.0 is not a very good idea IMO.
Regards,
KAM
Hummm...log mail.info only reflect more than one treatment by spamassassin.
See processes hereafter.
...
Dec 3 19:36:55 vps622 postfix/smtpd[7541]: 8D3653574419:
client=mail-pz0-f47.google.com[209.85.210.47]
Dec 3 19:36:55 vps622 postfix/cleanup[7543]: 8D3653574419:
message-id=<CADwU8diy+PZ5hQvLpTuE8Ljwa5rGbwATkF+=tykghfegpyc...@mail.gmail.com>
Dec 3 19:36:55 vps622 postfix/qmgr[19645]: 8D3653574419:
from=<b...@zzzz.com>, size=1476, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Dec 3 19:36:55 vps622 spamd[1165]: spamd: connection from
localhost [127.0.0.1] at port 60247
Dec 3 19:36:55 vps622 spamd[1165]: spamd: setuid to spamfilter succeeded
Dec 3 19:36:55 vps622 spamd[1165]: spamd: processing message
<CADwU8diy+PZ5hQvLpTuE8Ljwa5rGbwATkF+=tykghfegpyc...@mail.gmail.com> for
spamfilter:5001
Dec 3 19:36:56 vps622 spamd[1165]: spamd: identified spam
(97.5/2.0) for spamfilter:5001 in 1.0 seconds, 1512 bytes.
Dec 3 19:36:56 vps622 spamd[1165]: spamd: result: Y 97 -
BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,TVD_SPACE_RATIO,T_DKIM_INVALID,USER_IN_BLACKLIST scantime=1.0,size=1512,user=spamfilter,uid=5001,required_score=2.0,rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=60247,mid=<CADwU8diy+PZ5hQvLpTuE8Ljwa5rGbwATkF+=tykghfegpyc...@mail.gmail.com>,bayes=0.000000,autolearn=no Dec 3 19:36:57 vps622 spamd[1164]: prefork: child states:
II
Dec 3 19:36:57 vps622 postfix/pipe[7544]: 8D3653574419:
to=<x...@yyyyyyy.org>, relay=myprocmail, delay=2.4,
delays=1.3/0.01/0/1.2, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered via
myprocmail service)
Well this one is a score of 97.5 and indicates user_in_blacklist worked:
spamd: result: Y 97 -
BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,TVD_SPACE_RATIO,T_DKIM_INVALID,USER_IN_BLACKLIST
..etc..
This header indicates a different score and not spam and no
user_in_blacklist:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=2.0
tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,TVD_SPACE_RATIO,T_DKIM_INVALID
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
That header is coming from somewhere...
However, the required=2.0 is highly odd. Try changing to
required=2.1 or something similar in your local.cf and see if you
get two different required scores.
regards,
KAM
Solved.
Indeed it was already working previously.
My confusion came from my reading of the file mail.info
In fact for USER_IN_BLACKLIST there is *no* indication like the following :
For a real spam the following is indicated in the log file.
Obviously this is not the case for USER_IN_BLACKLIST.
...
spamd: identified spam (5.0/2.0) for spamfilter:5001 in 0.6 seconds,
1451 bytes.
...
Thanks for your attention.
Bye,
Bruno
