On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 16:48 +0000, RW wrote: > On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 16:43:04 +0000 > RW wrote: > > > On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 10:06:44 +1000 > > Noel Butler wrote: > > > > > > > its up to them if they want to or not, the spam folders have very > > > little in them here because of our approach, and in our tests we > > > have had 0.00000001% of FP's in that, which is really good. > > > > At 1.7 million email a day that's at very most 1 FP in 16 years, which > > would suggest you have had less than 1 FP since SA was released. > > OK I missed "12 front ends", but even so, it's still not credible.
You people need to get out more, I see I included one (1) (uno) extra zero, but the care factor is still just as low. I couldnt give a rats if the FP rate was a full 1.0%, that's far better than them having the suspected gutter trash in their inbox where they must open the message in full, the lack of complaints we get proves to me our system works, so sorry if YOU (and others) cant live with that, it simply just aint my problem.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
