On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 16:56:38 -0300 Christian Grunfeld <christian.grunf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> with your logic.... why do you have door locks in your house? 1) What I'm protecting [my family and my posessions] is a lot more valuable to me than a few seconds wasted by a spam that slips through. 2) I don't have hundreds of people a day coming to my house and trying to get in. So the cost of checking who is at the door each time someone knocks is manageable, but the cost of checking every incoming email manually is not. [...] > Good example but bad knowledge about maths. They are NOT there only to > come up with alternative reasoning solutions. They are there to give > the SAME solution with less effort ! How is it less effort to be forced to check every incoming email than to allow your computer to do some or most of that work? You are not making any sense. You are advocating a system that is guaranteed to produce false-positives and that avoids losing mail to FPs by requiring manual sorting of email. Regards, David.
