On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 03:11:48 -0800 (PST) pipjg wrote: > > Hi, > > Was wondering if could have some advice, and I probably know what I'm > going to do anyway, just wanted a few others opinions.. > > I've been analysing a load of mail which is having it's SA score > reduced by what looks like paid for whitelists. A view of the SA > scores I'm seeing is: > > Rule Total Ham % Spam % > RP_MATCHES_RCVD 161,165 142,559 88.5 > 18,606 11.5 RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE 22,405 22,399 > 100 6 0 RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED 22,130 > 22,125 100 5 0 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL > 12,794 43 0.3 12,751 99.7 > T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD 7,080 5,072 71.6 > 2,008 28.4 > > Now looking at virtualls ALL of these they look like SPAM.
No they don't, you haven't read your own results correctly. RCVD_IN_RP_SAFE and RCVD_IN_RP_CERTIFIED are ~100% Ham. RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL is a blacklist rule, so it's supposed to hit spam. [T_]RP_MATCHES_RCVD are not ReturnPath whitelist rules: describe RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain Everything related to ReturnPath.net/senderscore is working remarkably well for you. > For some reason I can't find any scores for T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD. Am I > being dumn here? Does the T_ mean something I don't know? T_* rules are under test, so it's an earlier name for RP_MATCHES_RCVD.
