have you turned off RBLs and other network tests you dont need and disabled
any non-standard rules and plugins?

if you are using RBLS's have a a caching nameserver on the SA machine
itself (even if your 'local' DNS server is only a couple of milliseconds
away a caching namesserver on the box itself helps hugely).

any clues on the maillog or of you run spammassassin with "--lint --debug"
on a sample?

-- 
Martin Hepworth
Oxford, UK


On 17 November 2011 15:55, Tom <t...@t0mb.net> wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> ======= Information ==============
> Old Version: spamassassin-3.2.5-1.el5
> New EL5 Version: spamassassin-3.3.1-2.el6.x86_**64
> New EL6 Version: spamassassin-3.3.1-2.el5.x86_**64
>
> SPAMDOPTIONS="-d -L -i 10.44.219.208 -A 10.44.217.0/20 -m 40 -q -x -u
> spamd --min-children=40"
>
> Other info Bayes module disabled, compiled regexes being used, RBL checks
> disabled, network checks disabled.
> =============================
>
> I have had a problem trying to upgrade from 3.2.5 to 3.3.1 on both
> CentOS5, and a brand new install on CentOS6.
>
> I want to retain the basic configuration I'm using.  Basically, 3.2.5
> works fine, and I'm processing up to 600 mails per minute sometimes.  When
> I try and use 3.3.1 with the same general configuration, mail seems to be
> processed correctly, and the strength of the newer rules is brilliant in
> terms of accuracy, but as soon as I start the service, the load average on
> the server starts climbing until it roughly equals the number of children
> we have configured, and performance starts to get pretty bad.  This seems
> to happen whether I use the round-robin method or the default scaling
> method.
>
> I can't really see why my load average is climbing so high.
>
> Can anyone suggest what is happening and why it might be so different?
>  I've been banging my head against the desk trying to get to the bottom of
> this.  I first tried to upgrade to 3.3.1 a while ago, and got the issue.
>  This was with a src rpm build of the apache supplied tarball.  Then centos
> 5.7 came out, and they upgraded to 3.3.1, so I came in to work one day with
> my whole cluster falling to pieces and after failing to fix the issue, I
> downgraded again and excluded spamassassin from updates.  I've now tried on
> centos6, and it's still the same.
>
> Many thanks.  Tom Boland.
>

Reply via email to