On 11/14, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > >I still haven't seen any problems running trunk since I began in April. > Out of interest, have you been doing rules separately or are you now > able to update with sa-update under trunk?
Not entirely sure what you're asking. sa-update has always worked. I considered mentioning the stuff about trunk not getting properly generated scores until recently, but obviously I didn't ( https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6644 ). I have not been doing rules separately. These packages contain a snapshot of rules I pulled via sa-update on 2011-05-25, just to satisfy the existing Debian packaging. Maybe I should be clearer that I expect people to use sa-update. > > SpamAssassin 3.4.0 release candidate 1 is now 45 days overdue. > > We're moving towards a very nice release and I'm less worried about > the 9/30 goal if we didn't have such great movement on tickets > going. I certainly haven't forgotten! I know. I really appreciate all the work you've done recently. The momentum is great. And I agree that getting stuff fixed is more important in the short term than getting a releases out. But it bothers me how hard it is to get out an official release. > Next thing on my plate is getting the DNS changes done to test the > ipv6-only mirror/sa-update. Excellent. > I haven't looked at the curl/wget version of sa-update and wonder if > we ripped all of LWP out which breaks sa-update on windows... Don't think so: "If an external program is not available, fall back to LWP;" - https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6654#c11 -- "Hermes will help you get your wagon unstuck, but only if you push on it." - Greek Alphabet Oracle http://www.ChaosReigns.com
