Alex,
> > No, the DKIM_VERIFIED (or rather: DKIM_VALID, as it is now called)
> Shouldn't then L_UNVERIFIED_GMAIL be updated to rely upon DKIM_VALID
> instead of the deprecated DKIM_VERIFIED?
Yes, definitely, if still in use. Where did you find it, it's not
one of the stock rules. Probably posted (possibly by me) a long time ago.
With the introduction of ADSP support in the DKIM plugin (see
the Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM man page), the function of
a L_UNVERIFIED_GMAIL has now (since version 3.3.0) been taken over
by the following adsp_override directive and corresponding rules
in the stock SpamAssassin ruleset:
adsp_override gmail.com custom_med
header DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED eval:check_dkim_adsp('2')
meta NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED && !__VIA_ML && !__VIA_RESIGNER
score NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED 0 1.2 0 0.9
...giving 0.9 spam points to a mail claiming to be from gmail.com
but not having a valid DKIM signature (and similarly for other domains
known to be signing all their outgoing mail).
Mark
