On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 20:39:24 +0200 Robert Schetterer wrote: > in my case > there is so less left, passing postscreen, rbls, greylisting, > clamav-milter with sanesecurity and few other smtp checks, that nearly > null i.e > faked paypal mail getting at last to spamassassin where its stopped > mostly by other rules and rejected by spamass-milter, so using spf > check isnt hardly needed anymore,
His point was that SPF isn't there to catch spam, it there to identify legitimate mail from selected domains, and prevent it being falsely identified as spam.
