> On 30/09/11 01:41, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: >> Sure a lot of "Your mailbox has exceeded" spam these days.
Phish rises this time of year ;-) On 09/30/2011 09:31 AM, Ned Slider wrote: > I've seen a few of these, but probably not enough examples to have > Bayes reliably catch them yet - the first few sneaked straight > through uncaught. Right, phish thrives on low volume so it can stay under the radar. Bayes is not good at catching such things. > If we could organise a working group or something, and/or collect > some examples, I'd happily help with writing some rules specifically > for these. I'd be game for helping there too. Phish Tank is a starting point, though it is riddled with non-phish (both spam and FPs).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
