On 8/13/11 7:02 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
(Also, I forward every bogus invitation toab...@linkedin.com, and this
seems to result in them spending a few minutes giving me
too-hard-to-believe-its-true claim it's not their fault.)
also forward them to return path.. certificat...@returnpath.net they
get paid to 'certify' that linked in isn't spamming.
enough complaints, and they will stop (unless linked in pays them a
lot.. they we go back to argument about SA scoring all these high
scoring spammers just because linked in pays return path to ignore
complaints).. and, yes, I have gone round and round with return path
about linked in.
they say I must have signed up.. (I said prove it), they could not. it
was a harvested spamtrap address. they said, well, these are not UCE,
they are 'transactional' since it wasn't selling anything, just inviting
me to join. (join what? linked in? a 501C3 non profit charitable
organization? ).. no, a commercial organization.
no, return path should de-certify linked in until they have a button
like the others have' click here to report abuse' /and/or click here to
never get invitations again.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
* Best Intrusion Prevention Product
* Hot Company Finalist 2011
* Best Email Security Product
* Certified SNORT Integrator
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
______________________________________________________________________
