On 2011-07-14 18:03, Jezz wrote:
"Axb" <axb.li...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4e1e129b.7020...@gmail.com...
On 2011-07-13 23:35, Jezz wrote:
LWP is what the plugin uses to fetch the web site so if you don't have
that available it won't work at all.
if MDaemon provides a port of sa-update LWP may be supported
shot in the dark:
what happens if you comment out as:
# use Sys::Syslog qw(:DEFAULT setlogsock);
Calling SteveF... would you hack syslog out of the plugin for Win32
users?
:)
I tried commenting out that line, and then did a lint, and it gave me no
errors at all - not regarding LWP either. Tell me, should I expect to
see an
error regarding LWP if, I in fact, didn't have that package?
MDaemon does indeed provide a port of sa-update. However it's theoretically
possible that Mouk may not have included a particular package (eg. LWP)
within the spamd executable even though it is included in the sa-update
executable. I have noticed in the past some small discrepancies in the
packages which Mouk includes, or doesn't include, between those two
executables. So I may need to ask him directly about that.
Nevertheless, I'm interested in knowing if I should expect to see some kind
of error, when I do a lint, if I don't have LWP yet a plugin is requiring
LWP is "the browser" that grabs the cloacked URI and "follows" to the
target.
Without it, the plugin is useless.
http://search.cpan.org/~gaas/libwww-perl-6.02/lib/LWP.pm
tells you what it does.
