On 6/11/2011 10:03 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
guys -- I'm going to make the whole question moot (in trunk at least)
-- the only reason SOUGHT and SOUGHT_FRAUD were being checked in there
was to make their accuracy visible in ruleqa. It's been months since
I've looked at that, so it's needless. I'll remove them from svn
asap.
--j.
WAIT!!! Wouldn't this remove our ability to check for false positives of
your patterns against the much larger ham collection of nightly masscheck?
I wouldn't be concerned about this if there were a way to collaborate on
feeding more ham into SOUGHT's safety check corpus, but when I asked
about this earlier you seemed hesitant.
Warren
