On Mon, 23 May 2011, Alex wrote:
Is there a method for separating the experimental rules from those
that are relatively safe to use in production?
Nightly masschecks. Apparently we are short on recent SPAM, so the rules
are not being auto-promoted. If you have a good collection of hand-graded
SPAM, you should get set up to submit nightly masschecks so that we can
auto-promote the good rules.
I see. So the generally adopted way for using those rules is that
people run their own masschecks using the public corpa, then based on
rules that they think are acceptable promote the rules to production?
No, the standard way to use dev sandbox rules is via sa-update. Let the
infrastructure do the testing and promotion.
Non-sandbox third party rules would be a matter of local testing at low
scores, performance evaluation, and score adjustment based on the results.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
An entitlement beneficiary is a person or special interest group
who didn't earn your money, but demands the right to take your
money because they *want* it. -- John McKay, _The Welfare State:
No Mercy for the Middle Class_
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
165 days since the first successful private orbital launch (SpaceX)
