On 4/18/2011 3:54 PM, Sergei wrote: > Not only that but the whole email gets re-written as well with the body of > the email becoming the Spamassassin report. I.e., > > pts rule name description > ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- > -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low > trust > [217.69.128.173 listed in list.dnswl.org] > -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list > 2.0 RATWARE_MPOP_WEBMAIL Bulk email fingerprint (mPOP Web-Mail) > 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is freemail (lenamariay[at]mail.ru) > -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record > -100 USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's SPF whitelist > 2.3 FSL_RU_URL URI: FSL_RU_URL > -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% > [score: 0.0000] > 0.0 MIME_BASE64_BLANKS RAW: Extra blank lines in base64 encoding > 1.8 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header > 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no > rDNS > 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid > > Check out "From: address is in the user's white-list" I should have read the > report better. So how come is it still considered spam?
Good question. How are you calling SA? -- Bowie
