On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:59:32 +0000, Michael Scheidell <michael.scheid...@secnap.com> wrote: > Its marked no spam. So where is the problem?
he wanted it to NOT being marked as spam and it complicated with fetchmail
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 18:59:32 +0000, Michael Scheidell <michael.scheid...@secnap.com> wrote: > Its marked no spam. So where is the problem?
he wanted it to NOT being marked as spam and it complicated with fetchmail