> On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, Max wrote: > >> Heres the output of spamassassin -D --lint: >> >> [29434] dbg: bayes: DB journal sync: last sync: 1301418690 >> [29434] dbg: bayes: corpus size: nspam = 114087, nham = 43887 >> [29434] dbg: bayes: score = 0.0443902978533707 >> [29434] dbg: bayes: DB expiry: tokens in DB: 135674, Expiry max size: >> 150000, Oldest atime: 1301021279, Newest atime: 1301421270, Last >> expire: 1301366854, Current time: 1301421320
On 29.03.11 11:04, John Hardin wrote: > That's a pretty good bayes corpus size. I'd expect your bayes scores to > be more definitive. if that was manually trained, it should. Was it manually trained? -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Quantum mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of.
