On 2011/03/17 13:28, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
On 03/18, Hamad Ali wrote:
> No. Michael doesn't want to help you and Karsten doesn't want you to
> participate in mass-checks because of your behavior on this list.
Are you referring to ban on masschecks, or ban on receiving any sort of
help what so ever?
I'm saying it's the same problem.
There's no ban. There's just people not wanting to deal with your
behavior.
But for non-masschecks free mails should be irrelevant, shouldn't they?
No.
Are you saying that my recent mail, titled "SA and Spear Phishing" is also
a reply to a previous thread? That's weird (I created a new mail with
stuff being pasted).
You replied to a previous thread by creating a new thread. And that's
pissing people off.
Some may figure a person too dumb to use "reply" rather than creating
a new email is too hopeless to try to work with. Is he worth the energy
to try to deal with him?
As far as trust for mass checks "Hamad Ali" would have to trust the
custodians of the mass check data with the raw email stream data he
submits.
(The best protection against spear phishing is a suspicious mind
operated by well trained employees. And there's not much Hamad can
do about that whether he is legitimate or a cloaked spammer. Poor kid.)
{^_^}