So this actually is a reply to the last post to your previous thread
"how to disable network tests". Merely changing the subject and pruning
the quote from the body -- surprise -- does NOT make it a new thread. On
the up-side, it appears you at least did read (I mean "keep" here) the
thread. Encouraging.
There has been a lot of help, advice, and questions concerning your
previous topic, however. The down-side. You did not care to even get
back to a single one of them. Very discouraging.
Do you really expect anyone to care and try to help a single-shot
question you vent on the list again?
I for one, bloody don't.
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 06:08 +0400, Hamad Ali wrote:
> Hi folks -- wondering if anyone has monitored SA's performance against
> phishing mails. SA is able to detect 86% of phishing emails my clients
So you got paying clients. But won't communicate with the community.
> get, with 0.5% false positives on all the ham. It seems non-phish-SPAM
> is easier to be detected than phish (~99% for non-phish spam). Probably
> I need to participate on nightly checks to improve phish and lower
> false positives.
Participating in the mass-checks!? Without any communication (hint, two
ways) at all? I don't see that happening.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
