On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 01:53 +0100, Mikael Syska wrote:
> I get the following hits:
> Content analysis details: (19.1 points, 5.0 required)
Note though, that your score is on SA 3.3.x, while the OP uses SA 3.2.x.
Yes, I can tell this from the scores. :)
Major changes between these version are clearly reflected in your score
and rules hit. Namely a lot of work by John Hardin to catch exactly such
fraud, and the FreeMail plugin now upstream -- with 3.2 it is available
as a third-party plugin.
> 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
> > X-Spam-testscores: AWL=1.086,BAYES_00=-2.599,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
> > MILLION_USD=1.528
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
