I can't comment about the particular URIs mentioned in this discussion, but we do run some URI rules that are redundant with URIBL listings.
The reason we do this is because URIBL listings will sometimes time-out and be removed. So we will list some domain names in our rules in case they are dropped by URIBL et al later. On 3/2/2011 8:49 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > > Point being, this domain and likely most (if not all) others in the list > you're basing off, are listed in URI DNSBLs. This particular one is > listed in URIBL and SURBL JP and PH. With network test enabled, SA will > score them high already. > > So what is the point in this static, and likely huge, list of uri rules? > >
