On Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:48:51 +0000 RW <rwmailli...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> That's true for person to person mail, but there are kinds of mail > where loss is inconsequential and no-one is going to read the DSNs > e.g. newsletters. Strongly disagree. If you're sending newsletters, you'd *darn better* have a bounce-processor that can help keep your lists clean. Otherwise, you'll be spewing unwanted messages to nonexistent recipients without even realizing it. On the rare occasion you don't want a DSN, you use an envelope sender of <>. Regards, David.
