On 1/28/11 8:21 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
I said this the last time we had hard-to-follow bogus whitelisting
debate, but I think SA needs a policy statement about any DNSWL which
gets negative points. Specifically, there needs to be a really obvious
way to complain*by sending email* (not a web form)
its not in a obvious place, but look at my post. you can complain via
email, and not a web form.
12? 18 months ago? or so, it was really bad. all kinds of spam with
two different certified senders whitelists.
returnpath has TREMENDOUSLY cleaned up their clients.
this in fact, is the first one I have gotten in a long time, which is
why I didn't remember how to find the abuse address (which should be
'abuse@')
and -2 points isn't as bad as some of the other stock -7.5 points
amazon for crying out loud. I don't remember when I got anything but
spam from them.
def_whitelist_from_spf *@amazon.com
that said, I still think there needs to be a easy link to report spam on
returnpath's web site. under contact, and/or, like most of their ESP
clients who have a clearly stated anti-spam link with a abuse@ address
for reporting spam.
(and, no, so far, no followup from RP on the abuse complaint)
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
ISN: 1259*1300
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Certified SNORT Integrator
* 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance
* Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness
* Best in Email Security,2010: Network Products Guide
* King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
______________________________________________________________________
