Le 27/01/2011 15:12, Michael Scheidell a écrit : > On 1/26/11 11:58 PM, Sahil Tandon wrote: >>> reject_rhsbl_sender dbl.spamhaus.org=127.0.1.2, >> Sound advice to advocate good practices, but in more recent version of >> Postfix, this should not be required. > eh? > > reject_rhsbl_sender dbl.spamhaus.org can return (potentially) one of > several 127.* values. > '1.2' for spam, and the others are reserved for phishing, etc. > > what does cleaning up postfix code have to do about FP's? > its not a FP if it returns 127.0.2.5, it just means something different > than 127.0.1.2, and if you block on any 127* return, then you are > blocking on more than just spam. > > >
an FP like what? like <idiot@23.45.67.5>? that's hardly an FP. it's invalid. there's no point in trying to fight the army of junkers while supporting the army of losers. that's a lost game.
