On 2011/01/13 1:40 PM, Brendan Murtagh wrote:
X-spam-flag: YES X-spam-status: Yes, hits=3.01 required=3.00 tests=HTML_MESSAGE=0.00,RATWARE_RCVD_BONUS_SPC=1.00,VOWEL_URI_5=1.00,NO_RDNS2=0.01,MR_DIFF_MID=1.00 version=3.2.5 X-spam-level: *** X-spam-checker-version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (1.1)
Yes, 3.0 is too low, but so is your SA version. None of those 1.00 point rules exist in the current version of SA. That's not to say the current version wouldn't also have issues with BB mail, but you'd at least be dealing with a modern ruleset.
-- /Jason
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
